In [1]:
%load_ext autoreload
%autoreload 2
%matplotlib inline
import warnings
warnings.filterwarnings('ignore')
import pandas as pd
from db_utils import query_hive_ssh
import re
import copy
from diff_utils import *
import time
import numpy as np

Random Sample

Consider comments made since min_timestamp. Take n random comments from non-bot users.

Params


In [2]:
n = 50000
min_timestamp = '2000-01-01T00:00:00Z' # start of time

Query


In [6]:
t1 = time.time()
query = """
SELECT 
    *
FROM
    enwiki.article_talk_diff_no_bot_sample
WHERE
    rev_timestamp > '%(min_timestamp)s'
    AND ns = 'article'
LIMIT %(n)d
"""

params = {
    'n': int(n * 1.7),
    'min_timestamp': min_timestamp
    }

df = query_hive_ssh(query % params, '../../data/raw_random_sample.tsv', priority = True, quoting=3, delete = True)
df.columns = [c.split('.')[1] for c in df.columns]
t2 = time.time()
print('Query and Download Time:', (t2-t1) / 60.0)


Query and Download Time: 2.49198743502299

In [12]:
dfc = clean(df[300:500])

In [13]:
show_comments(dfc, 100)


WikiProject United States|class=Start|importance=Low|TX=yes|TX-importance=Low}}NEWLINE{{WikiProject Biography
________________________________________________________________________________
WikiProject United States|class=Start|importance=Low|TX=yes|TX-importance=Low}}
{{WikiProject Biography


 ################################################################################ 


NEWLINE: You're right. The wikitext links are blanked out... [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=List_of_historic_places_in_Toronto&oldid=510287075 it didn't start this way].  --  [[User:Zanimum|Zanimum]] ([[User talk:Zanimum|talk]]) 20:00, 12 November 2012 (UTC)
________________________________________________________________________________
 You're right. The wikitext links are blanked out... it didn't start this way.      


 ################################################################################ 


NEWLINENEWLINEMustaine is a Christian Conservative with no party affiliation, he only voted for Bush based on the poor quality of the Democratic candidates. Hes made public statements about that and although his fans may not like it, thats the fact. UA is a perfect example of his views, right wing in the extreme in some areas. NEWLINE
________________________________________________________________________________
Mustaine is a Christian Conservative with no party affiliation, he only voted for Bush based on the poor quality of the Democratic candidates. Hes made public statements about that and although his fans may not like it, thats the fact. UA is a perfect example of his views, right wing in the extreme in some areas. 


 ################################################################################ 


(OD)No offense intended JMsf, but this again shows you don't have a firm grasp on WP policy. If you have a problem with [[WP:LENGTH]], please open up a case on the relevant policy board. Making a case to disregard long-standing policy on an article's talk page won't help. You can't gain consensus here and override policy. It doesn't matter how much text you quote here, it's not going to change the policy. [[User:Dayewalker|Dayewalker]] ([[User talk:Dayewalker|talk]]) 20:20, 4 January 2009 (UTC)NEWLINENEWLINE
________________________________________________________________________________
(OD)No offense intended JMsf, but this again shows you don't have a firm grasp on WP policy. If you have a problem with WP:LENGTH, please open up a case on the relevant policy board. Making a case to disregard long-standing policy on an article's talk page won't help. You can't gain consensus here and override policy. It doesn't matter how much text you quote here, it's not going to change the policy.   


 ################################################################################ 


{{WPBiography |living=yes |class= |priority= |filmbio-work-group=yes |needs-photo = yes |listas=Yamamoto, Hikaru}} NEWLINE{{WikiProject Japan|class=|importance=}}
________________________________________________________________________________
 


 ################################################################################ 


NEWLINE:[[Països Catalans]] doesn't show .cat in its infobox so I'd have thought just removing the internet tld field here was reasonable. As to .me the reply has already been given as regards .tv above by Jmccormac. The .me domain is operated as a generic name rather than a closed one. [[User:Dmcq|Dmcq]] ([[User talk:Dmcq|talk]]) 23:35, 10 January 2013 (UTC)
________________________________________________________________________________
Països Catalans doesn't show .cat in its infobox so I'd have thought just removing the internet tld field here was reasonable. As to .me the reply has already been given as regards .tv above by Jmccormac. The .me domain is operated as a generic name rather than a closed one.   


 ################################################################################ 


"==Title of the article==NEWLINEThe Portuguese name ""Encontro das Águas"" was translated literally as ""The Meeting of Waters"". I think this is not the best translation nor title. First, as the Portuguese article, it should not have ""The"" in front, it is not Wiki style. Second, a best word for translating ""encontro"" in this context is ""rendezvous"", so I do think the article should be rename as '''Rendezvous of waters'''. Just Google and see this is the most common translation[http://www.concierge.com/cntraveler/blogs/perrinpost/2008/02/river-rides-fad.html] so by Wiki rules, the article name should be changed. Alternatively, there is merit to keep the original Portuguese name '''Encontro das Águas''', as it is used as shown by Google,[http://www.ecoviagem.com.br/agencia-turismo/amazonas/manaus/eco-discovery-tours.asp][http://www.planetware.com/manaus/encontro-das-aguas-bra-am-meda.htm][http://www.packtours.com.br/dest/amazonas/mao/tours/meetingwaters.htm]. Many tour agencies use the Portuguese name in English publicity.--[[User:Mariordo|Mariordo]] ([[User talk:Mariordo|talk]]) 16:18, 23 August 2008 (UTC)"
________________________________________________________________________________
"==Title of the article==
The Portuguese name ""Encontro das Águas"" was translated literally as ""The Meeting of Waters"". I think this is not the best translation nor title. First, as the Portuguese article, it should not have ""The"" in front, it is not Wiki style. Second, a best word for translating ""encontro"" in this context is ""rendezvous"", so I do think the article should be rename as Rendezvous of waters. Just Google and see this is the most common translation so by Wiki rules, the article name should be changed. Alternatively, there is merit to keep the original Portuguese name Encontro das Águas, as it is used as shown by Google,. Many tour agencies use the Portuguese name in English publicity.  "


 ################################################################################ 


"NEWLINE:::Not a little over emphatic, are we? ""The worst sort of POV"", seriously? I would think the worst sort of POV would be ""Joseph Smith is a lying curr"" or ""Joseph Smith was the smartest man to have ever lived""... that sort of thing. Please, let's try to keep the tension out of the discussion. Or, at the very least, keep the name calling under control.NEWLINE:::That being said, I can't see how Cowdry's background helps define or explain Smith. I say leave it out. If they met at a diving convention, you'd have a point. But simply being a diviner, as were several hundred other people that had nothing to do with Smith, is not enough for me. [[User:Padillah|Padillah]] ([[User talk:Padillah|talk]]) 17:51, 8 June 2010 (UTC)"
________________________________________________________________________________
"
Not a little over emphatic, are we? ""The worst sort of POV"", seriously? I would think the worst sort of POV would be ""Joseph Smith is a lying curr"" or ""Joseph Smith was the smartest man to have ever lived""... that sort of thing. Please, let's try to keep the tension out of the discussion. Or, at the very least, keep the name calling under control.
That being said, I can't see how Cowdry's background helps define or explain Smith. I say leave it out. If they met at a diving convention, you'd have a point. But simply being a diviner, as were several hundred other people that had nothing to do with Smith, is not enough for me.   "


 ################################################################################ 


"NEWLINE:::::OK, but the ""liberal sources"" bit was already resolved. --[[User:Haizum|<b>Haizum</b>]] <b>   μολὼν λαβέ</b> 22:20, 1 November 2007 (UTC)"
________________________________________________________________________________
"
OK, but the ""liberal sources"" bit was already resolved.     μολὼν λαβέ "


 ################################################################################ 


NEWLINENEWLINEWell the only reason most people come to this page , is to see how much the albums actually sold. The certified shipment figures are meaningless as they dont follow the order the albums are listed in, therefore the sales should be included. I dont see why having just the top ten sales affects the rest. But if it cannot be together, then it makes more sense , and much more useful a page, to have just the top ten, as it was until recently. NEWLINEThanks [[Special:Contributions/86.178.229.183|86.178.229.183]] ([[User talk:86.178.229.183|talk]]) 00:55, 16 April 2012 (UTC)NEWLINENEWLINE
________________________________________________________________________________
Well the only reason most people come to this page , is to see how much the albums actually sold. The certified shipment figures are meaningless as they dont follow the order the albums are listed in, therefore the sales should be included. I dont see why having just the top ten sales affects the rest. But if it cannot be together, then it makes more sense , and much more useful a page, to have just the top ten, as it was until recently. 
Thanks 86.178.229.183  


 ################################################################################ 


:unless it is taken as meaning 'so-named' in a less than further so assigned manner. [[Special:Contributions/184.76.53.217|184.76.53.217]] ([[User talk:184.76.53.217|talk]]) 11:43, 30 March 2010 (UTC)NEWLINENEWLINE
________________________________________________________________________________
unless it is taken as meaning 'so-named' in a less than further so assigned manner. 184.76.53.217  


 ################################################################################ 


::Please read [[WP:OR]] again. You can't use primary sources to prove a point, and you can't add sources that don't discuss the Qur'an to argue a point about the Qur'an. You can do this in an essay, journal article, or book, but not here. Your sources must specifically discuss the Qur'an. I'm sorry that your hard work is being reverted (just now by me), but it doesn't comply with our core policies. [[User:Dougweller|Dougweller]] ([[User talk:Dougweller|talk]]) 11:30, 22 May 2011 (UTC)NEWLINENEWLINE
________________________________________________________________________________
Please read WP:OR again. You can't use primary sources to prove a point, and you can't add sources that don't discuss the Qur'an to argue a point about the Qur'an. You can do this in an essay, journal article, or book, but not here. Your sources must specifically discuss the Qur'an. I'm sorry that your hard work is being reverted (just now by me), but it doesn't comply with our core policies.   


 ################################################################################ 


"{{tan}}NEWLINENEWLINENEWLINE== Name ==NEWLINEcan anyone shed any light on why its called Media CityUK, and not simply Media City? [[Special:Contributions/194.176.105.132|194.176.105.132]] ([[User talk:194.176.105.132|talk]]) 11:38, 13 September 2011 (UTC)NEWLINE:Its called MediaCityUK, formally MediaCity:UK as a branding excercise, there are half a dozen other MediaCitys round the world though theres no actual connection between them other than similar concept. [[User:WatcherZero|WatcherZero]] ([[User talk:WatcherZero|talk]]) 11:50, 13 September 2011 (UTC)NEWLINENEWLINE== Merge proposal ==NEWLINENEWLINEIs there any reason why this article ought not to be merged into [[Salford Quays]]? --[[User:Malleus Fatuarum|Malleus Fatuarum]] 01:04, 8 November 2007 (UTC)NEWLINENEWLINE:It's a major enough development and feature to have its own article. [[User:Dpaajones|David]] ([[User talk:Dpaajones|talk]]) 15:03, 23 February 2008 (UTC)NEWLINENEWLINE== Urban Explorers ==NEWLINENEWLINEDid anyone see this (http://www.mediacityblog.com/index.php/uk/article/urban_explorers_infiltrate_mediacityuk_take_amazing_photos/)? Relevant for the article?  <span style=""font-size: smaller;"" class=""autosigned"">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/81.96.109.98|81.96.109.98]] ([[User talk:81.96.109.98|talk]]) 23:10, 28 January 2010 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->NEWLINENEWLINE== Edit war ==NEWLINENEWLINEI wasn't edit warring I was merely copyediting a sprawling repetitive, overlinked article into something more readable. If you can explain why [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=MediaCityUK&action=historysubmit&diff=440501837&oldid=440501672 this] is an improvement I would be amazed.--[[User:J3Mrs|J3Mrs]] ([[User talk:J3Mrs|talk]]) 16:34, 20 July 2011 (UTC)NEWLINE: The comment was purely in relation to the repeated removal of the Granada studio image. I should add that I support the majority of your edits to the article text, which have helped to tighten things up considerably. [[User:Rangoon11|Rangoon11]] ([[User talk:Rangoon11|talk]]) 16:50, 20 July 2011 (UTC)NEWLINENEWLINE::Well would you mind undoing it? The Granada image is irrelevant to this article, it's not as though no images exist.--[[User:J3Mrs|J3Mrs]] ([[User talk:J3Mrs|talk]]) 17:03, 20 July 2011 (UTC)NEWLINE::: You seem to be missing my point, the Granda image is in my view highly relevant and I do not support its removal. [[User:Rangoon11|Rangoon11]] ([[User talk:Rangoon11|talk]]) 17:14, 20 July 2011 (UTC)NEWLINE::::And you seem to be missing mine, it's not relevant as this article is about Media City. Should the article include an image of the school moving to the site? by your reasoning it should.--[[User:J3Mrs|J3Mrs]] ([[User talk:J3Mrs|talk]]) 17:24, 20 July 2011 (UTC)NEWLINE::::: In my view it is because ITV will be a key tenant at MediaCity and the Granda Studios are historic and are being made redundant as a result of the move. I'm perfectly happy for the image to be replaced by one of the ITV building at MediaCity though, as soon as a suitable one is available.[[User:Rangoon11|Rangoon11]] ([[User talk:Rangoon11|talk]]) 17:59, 20 July 2011 (UTC)NEWLINENEWLINE== Why is Media City redirecting to MediaCityUK ==NEWLINEMedia City or Media Cities is a concept. Why is Media City page redirecting to MediaCityUK? There's even conferences devoted to the concept of Media Cities. --[[User:Mujalifah|Mujalifah]] ([[User talk:Mujalifah|talk]]) 23:20, 8 May 2013 (UTC)NEWLINENEWLINE== MediaCityUK will be in Salford AND Trafford ==NEWLINENEWLINEAlthough MediaCityUK claims to be in Salford, if the ITV production facility is built on Trafford Wharf than the development will be in [[Salford]] and [[Trafford]] which are two recognised locations. Does anyone think the page should make it clear that the development will be located on both sides of the Ship Canal in Salford and Trafford. [[User:Stevo1000|Stevo1000]] ([[User talk:Stevo1000|talk]]) 15:56, 4 August 2011 (UTC)NEWLINE: Yes, why not add this info to the Location section.[[User:Rangoon11|Rangoon11]] ([[User talk:Rangoon11|talk]]) 16:00, 4 August 2011 (UTC)NEWLINE:: I was just wondering if anyone else felt the same about this issue. Once the ITV production centre is built the site will be located in Salford and Trafford. [[User:Stevo1000|Stevo1000]] ([[User talk:Stevo1000|talk]]) 19:14, 4 August 2011 (UTC)NEWLINE::: MediaCity is in Salford, it does not and will not be on both sides of the ship canal but it will be linked to studios in Trafford. Please read the references properly.--[[User:J3Mrs|J3Mrs]] ([[User talk:J3Mrs|talk]]) 17:28, 5 August 2011 (UTC)NEWLINE::::The Ship Canal marks the boundary between Salford and Trafford, check Google Maps if you don't believe me. The main development will be on Salford Quays and the other ITV development will be on Trafford Wharf. If you want anymore proof, why would Trafford Council are examining
________________________________________________________________________________
"

 Name 
can anyone shed any light on why its called Media CityUK, and not simply Media City? 194.176.105.132  
Its called MediaCityUK, formally MediaCity:UK as a branding excercise, there are half a dozen other MediaCitys round the world though theres no actual connection between them other than similar concept.   

 Merge proposal 

Is there any reason why this article ought not to be merged into Salford Quays?  

It's a major enough development and feature to have its own article.   

 Urban Explorers 

Did anyone see this (http://www.mediacityblog.com/index.php/uk/article/urban_explorers_infiltrate_mediacityuk_take_amazing_photos/)? Relevant for the article?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.96.109.98   

 Edit war 

I wasn't edit warring I was merely copyediting a sprawling repetitive, overlinked article into something more readable. If you can explain why this is an improvement I would be amazed.  
 The comment was purely in relation to the repeated removal of the Granada studio image. I should add that I support the majority of your edits to the article text, which have helped to tighten things up considerably.   

Well would you mind undoing it? The Granada image is irrelevant to this article, it's not as though no images exist.  
 You seem to be missing my point, the Granda image is in my view highly relevant and I do not support its removal.   
And you seem to be missing mine, it's not relevant as this article is about Media City. Should the article include an image of the school moving to the site? by your reasoning it should.  
 In my view it is because ITV will be a key tenant at MediaCity and the Granda Studios are historic and are being made redundant as a result of the move. I'm perfectly happy for the image to be replaced by one of the ITV building at MediaCity though, as soon as a suitable one is available.  

 Why is Media City redirecting to MediaCityUK 
Media City or Media Cities is a concept. Why is Media City page redirecting to MediaCityUK? There's even conferences devoted to the concept of Media Cities.   

 MediaCityUK will be in Salford AND Trafford 

Although MediaCityUK claims to be in Salford, if the ITV production facility is built on Trafford Wharf than the development will be in Salford and Trafford which are two recognised locations. Does anyone think the page should make it clear that the development will be located on both sides of the Ship Canal in Salford and Trafford.   
 Yes, why not add this info to the Location section.  
 I was just wondering if anyone else felt the same about this issue. Once the ITV production centre is built the site will be located in Salford and Trafford.   
 MediaCity is in Salford, it does not and will not be on both sides of the ship canal but it will be linked to studios in Trafford. Please read the references properly.  
The Ship Canal marks the boundary between Salford and Trafford, check Google Maps if you don't believe me. The main development will be on Salford Quays and the other ITV development will be on Trafford Wharf. If you want anymore proof, why would Trafford Council are examining


 ################################################################################ 


|importance=low|variants=yes
________________________________________________________________________________
|importance=low|variants=yes


 ################################################################################ 


" The Mystery of the Night Monster)NEWLINE* Swiper the Fox (Dora the Explorer)NEWLINE* Mr. Talbot (Alvin and the Chipmunks Meet the Wolfman)NEWLINE* Morgana, Undertow and Cloak and Dagger (The Little Mermaid II: Return to the Sea)NEWLINE* Ebon, Shiv, Hot-Streak, Aquamaria, Boom and Slipstream (Static Shock)NEWLINE* Evil Emperor Zurg, Grubs, Hornets, Brain Pods, NOS-4-A2, Warp Darkmatter, Gravitina, Torque and XL (Buzz Lightyear of Star Command)NEWLINE* Boyd Scolarzo (Pelswick)NEWLINE* G-Clef and his Music Notes (Blue's Big Musical Movie)NEWLINE* The Celery Aliens, Steve, Laura and Max (Scooby-Doo and the Alien Invaders)NEWLINE* Carl Foutley and Hoodsey Bishop (As Told by Ginger)NEWLINE* General Specific, Private Public, The Angry Scientist, The Plot Device, X Agent and General Lee Outrageous (Sheep in the Big City)NEWLINE* [[Magneto (comics)|Magneto]] (X-Men: Evolution)NEWLINE* Coco LaBouche and Jean-Claude (Rugrats in Paris: The Movie)NEWLINE* Pterano and Rinkus and Sierra (The Land Before Time VII: The Stone of Cold Fire)NEWLINE* Yzma, Kronk and The Black Jaguars (The Emperor's New Groove)NEWLINE* Vulturo, Mentok the Mind-Taker and X the Eliminator (Harvey Birdman, Attomey at Law)NEWLINE* The Zeptar's Bandit (Lloyd in Space)NEWLINE* Dr. Phillium Benedict and his cronies (Recess School Out)NEWLINE* The Dogcatcher, Buster, Ruby, Scratchy, Sparky Francois and Mooch (Lady and the Tramp II: Scamp's Adventure)NEWLINE* Zim, GIR, Dib, Gaz and Tak (Invader Zim)NEWLINE* Denzel Crocker, Francis Parker, Vicky the Babysitter, Bronze Kneecap, The Iron Lung, Copper Cranium, Glided Arches, Brass Knuckles, The Giant Dr. Robot and The Body of Evil (The Fairly Oddparents)NEWLINE* Commander Lyle Tiberius Rourke and Lieutenant Helga Katrina Sinclair (Altantis: The Lost Empire)NEWLINE* Unowns and Molly Hale (Pokemon The Movie 3: Spell of the Unown)NEWLINE* Misdreavus (Pokerap GS)NEWLINE* Thrax (Osmosis Jones)NEWLINE* Aku the Demonic Wizard (Samurai Jack)NEWLINE* Grim Reaper, Mandy, Nergal and Nergal Junior (The Grim Adventures of Billy & Mandy)NEWLINE* Hector Con Carne,  Major Dr. Ghastly, Cod Commandos, Estroy and General Skarr (Evil Con Carne)NEWLINE* Tublat, Samuel, T. Philander, Queen La, Lt. Colonel Staquait and Nuru and Sheeta (The Legend of Tarzan)NEWLINE* Dr. Meta Evil and Dr. Eugene Aki (Medabots)NEWLINE* Impmon and Hypnos (Digimon Tamers)NEWLINE* Maxmillion Pegasus, Seto Kaiba and Paradox Brothers (Yu-Gi-Oh!)NEWLINE* The Venom Virus, Bill, The Old Creeper, Jagrauro, Gator Ghoul, Old Iron Face, The Tar Monster and Captain Cutler (Scooby-Doo and the Cyber Chase)NEWLINE* Tim Scam (Totally Spies!)NEWLINE* Domino of Team Rocket (Pokemon: Mewtwo Returns)NEWLINE* Robot Santa (from ""A Tales of Two Santas"")NEWLINE* Baron Blitz, The Gauntlet, The Birthday Bandit, Helius Inflato, Madam Snake, Mr. Large, Dehydro, Teachnor the Mechanized Man and Laser Pirate (Teamo Supremo)NEWLINE* Hacker, Buzz and Chase (Cyberchase)NEWLINE* Niju, Nuk, Yak and Sumac (Balto II: Wolf Quest)NEWLINE* Pom-Pom the Cat (Cinderella II: Dreams Come True)NEWLINE* Sanrouch (The Hunchback of Notre Dame II)NEWLINE* Reggie Bullnerd (Chalkzone)NEWLINE* Awful Alvin and The Angry Eyebrows (The Cartoon Adventures of Larryboy)NEWLINE* Baby Taz and Baby Sylvester (Baby Looney Tunes)NEWLINE* Dr. Drakken, Shego, Killigan, Gill, The Killer Bebes, DNAmy and Lord Monkey Fist (Kim Possible)NEWLINE* Captain Gantu (Lilo & Stitch)NEWLINE* Robot Electro Jones and Cubey and Socks (Whatever Happened to Robot Jones)NEWLINE* Scheck (Hey Arnold: The Movie)NEWLINE* The Mojo Jojo's Mutant Monkeys (The Powerpuff Girls Movie)NEWLINE* Kai Hiwatari (Beyblade)NEWLINE* The Headmistress (Mucha Lucha!)"
________________________________________________________________________________
" The Mystery of the Night Monster)
 Swiper the Fox (Dora the Explorer)
 Mr. Talbot (Alvin and the Chipmunks Meet the Wolfman)
 Morgana, Undertow and Cloak and Dagger (The Little Mermaid II: Return to the Sea)
 Ebon, Shiv, Hot-Streak, Aquamaria, Boom and Slipstream (Static Shock)
 Evil Emperor Zurg, Grubs, Hornets, Brain Pods, NOS-4-A2, Warp Darkmatter, Gravitina, Torque and XL (Buzz Lightyear of Star Command)
 Boyd Scolarzo (Pelswick)
 G-Clef and his Music Notes (Blue's Big Musical Movie)
 The Celery Aliens, Steve, Laura and Max (Scooby-Doo and the Alien Invaders)
 Carl Foutley and Hoodsey Bishop (As Told by Ginger)
 General Specific, Private Public, The Angry Scientist, The Plot Device, X Agent and General Lee Outrageous (Sheep in the Big City)
 Magneto (X-Men: Evolution)
 Coco LaBouche and Jean-Claude (Rugrats in Paris: The Movie)
 Pterano and Rinkus and Sierra (The Land Before Time VII: The Stone of Cold Fire)
 Yzma, Kronk and The Black Jaguars (The Emperor's New Groove)
 Vulturo, Mentok the Mind-Taker and X the Eliminator (Harvey Birdman, Attomey at Law)
 The Zeptar's Bandit (Lloyd in Space)
 Dr. Phillium Benedict and his cronies (Recess School Out)
 The Dogcatcher, Buster, Ruby, Scratchy, Sparky Francois and Mooch (Lady and the Tramp II: Scamp's Adventure)
 Zim, GIR, Dib, Gaz and Tak (Invader Zim)
 Denzel Crocker, Francis Parker, Vicky the Babysitter, Bronze Kneecap, The Iron Lung, Copper Cranium, Glided Arches, Brass Knuckles, The Giant Dr. Robot and The Body of Evil (The Fairly Oddparents)
 Commander Lyle Tiberius Rourke and Lieutenant Helga Katrina Sinclair (Altantis: The Lost Empire)
 Unowns and Molly Hale (Pokemon The Movie 3: Spell of the Unown)
 Misdreavus (Pokerap GS)
 Thrax (Osmosis Jones)
 Aku the Demonic Wizard (Samurai Jack)
 Grim Reaper, Mandy, Nergal and Nergal Junior (The Grim Adventures of Billy & Mandy)
 Hector Con Carne,  Major Dr. Ghastly, Cod Commandos, Estroy and General Skarr (Evil Con Carne)
 Tublat, Samuel, T. Philander, Queen La, Lt. Colonel Staquait and Nuru and Sheeta (The Legend of Tarzan)
 Dr. Meta Evil and Dr. Eugene Aki (Medabots)
 Impmon and Hypnos (Digimon Tamers)
 Maxmillion Pegasus, Seto Kaiba and Paradox Brothers (Yu-Gi-Oh!)
 The Venom Virus, Bill, The Old Creeper, Jagrauro, Gator Ghoul, Old Iron Face, The Tar Monster and Captain Cutler (Scooby-Doo and the Cyber Chase)
 Tim Scam (Totally Spies!)
 Domino of Team Rocket (Pokemon: Mewtwo Returns)
 Robot Santa (from ""A Tales of Two Santas"")
 Baron Blitz, The Gauntlet, The Birthday Bandit, Helius Inflato, Madam Snake, Mr. Large, Dehydro, Teachnor the Mechanized Man and Laser Pirate (Teamo Supremo)
 Hacker, Buzz and Chase (Cyberchase)
 Niju, Nuk, Yak and Sumac (Balto II: Wolf Quest)
 Pom-Pom the Cat (Cinderella II: Dreams Come True)
 Sanrouch (The Hunchback of Notre Dame II)
 Reggie Bullnerd (Chalkzone)
 Awful Alvin and The Angry Eyebrows (The Cartoon Adventures of Larryboy)
 Baby Taz and Baby Sylvester (Baby Looney Tunes)
 Dr. Drakken, Shego, Killigan, Gill, The Killer Bebes, DNAmy and Lord Monkey Fist (Kim Possible)
 Captain Gantu (Lilo & Stitch)
 Robot Electro Jones and Cubey and Socks (Whatever Happened to Robot Jones)
 Scheck (Hey Arnold: The Movie)
 The Mojo Jojo's Mutant Monkeys (The Powerpuff Girls Movie)
 Kai Hiwatari (Beyblade)
 The Headmistress (Mucha Lucha!)"


 ################################################################################ 


low
________________________________________________________________________________
low


 ################################################################################ 


, and that's not a conversation I feel like putting energy into with you
________________________________________________________________________________
, and that's not a conversation I feel like putting energy into with you


 ################################################################################ 


|screenshot=yes
________________________________________________________________________________
|screenshot=yes


 ################################################################################ 


"NEWLINE::: I really can not the relation of Vithoba, non-Brahmanical and the Pakistani article from unreliable source. No reliable sources still to establish Brahmanical nature of Varkaris. To Alastair Haines, ""non-Brahminical"" is NOT a denial of Vithoba worship being legitimately Hindu. If it were true then many folk cults (numerous across India) HINDU of deities like [[Khandoba]] where Brahman priests and their rituals are absent, would not be called Hinduism at all. The unorthodox (read no-Brahmnaical) ways of the Varkari - ""which accepted women, Shudras and outcaste ""untouchables"", something forbidden in classical brahminical Hinduism."" led to their glory and the glory of my Lord, Vithoba, who was ""an alternative to the existing pantheon of brahminical deities"", almost (not free in Pandharpur) free from ""rigid ritualistic worship and Brahmin (priestly) control"".--[[User:Redtigerxyz|<font color = ""red"" >Redtigerxyz</font>]] <sup> [[User talk:Redtigerxyz|Talk]] </sup> 10:50, 10 May 2009 (UTC)"
________________________________________________________________________________
"
 I really can not the relation of Vithoba, non-Brahmanical and the Pakistani article from unreliable source. No reliable sources still to establish Brahmanical nature of Varkaris. To Alastair Haines, ""non-Brahminical"" is NOT a denial of Vithoba worship being legitimately Hindu. If it were true then many folk cults (numerous across India) HINDU of deities like Khandoba where Brahman priests and their rituals are absent, would not be called Hinduism at all. The unorthodox (read no-Brahmnaical) ways of the Varkari - ""which accepted women, Shudras and outcaste ""untouchables"", something forbidden in classical brahminical Hinduism."" led to their glory and the glory of my Lord, Vithoba, who was ""an alternative to the existing pantheon of brahminical deities"", almost (not free in Pandharpur) free from ""rigid ritualistic worship and Brahmin (priestly) control"".  Talk  "


 ################################################################################ 


NEWLINEI don't think this article should be deleted because it is not a game guide and I also don't think this is a pointless article.--[[User:Taidawang|Taida]] 21:15, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
________________________________________________________________________________
I don't think this article should be deleted because it is not a game guide and I also don't think this is a pointless article. 


 ################################################################################ 


"NEWLINENEWLINE== ""Pro-UFO Advocates  Dismiss Roswell Incident"" edit request ==NEWLINENEWLINEThe second sentence in this section seems mis-worded to me:NEWLINE""While the initial Air Force report was a chief reason for this, another reason was the release of secret documents from 1948 that showed that top Air Force officials did not know what the UFO objects being reported in the media were, and their suspicion that the UFOs might actually be Soviet spy vehicles.""NEWLINEWhat I mean by this is that Air Force officials not knowing what the UFO was would seemingly add to the strength of an argument for it being of alien origin."
________________________________________________________________________________
"

 ""Pro-UFO Advocates  Dismiss Roswell Incident"" edit request 

The second sentence in this section seems mis-worded to me:
""While the initial Air Force report was a chief reason for this, another reason was the release of secret documents from 1948 that showed that top Air Force officials did not know what the UFO objects being reported in the media were, and their suspicion that the UFOs might actually be Soviet spy vehicles.""
What I mean by this is that Air Force officials not knowing what the UFO was would seemingly add to the strength of an argument for it being of alien origin."


 ################################################################################ 


Should these lyrics be on Wikipedia?  I don't recall it being normal practice to put lyrics on Wikipedia, and if I recall, you run into potential copyright problems if you do.NEWLINENEWLINE
________________________________________________________________________________
Should these lyrics be on Wikipedia?  I don't recall it being normal practice to put lyrics on Wikipedia, and if I recall, you run into potential copyright problems if you do.


 ################################################################################ 


low
________________________________________________________________________________
low


 ################################################################################ 


== MP4 is limited to stereo? ==NEWLINEWhy does this article mention that mp4 is limited to stereo, when the AAC (mp4 audio) codec is documented to support up to 48 channels? See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Advanced_Audio_Coding for more info.NEWLINENEWLINE
________________________________________________________________________________
 MP4 is limited to stereo? 
Why does this article mention that mp4 is limited to stereo, when the AAC (mp4 audio) codec is documented to support up to 48 channels? See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Advanced_Audio_Coding for more info.


 ################################################################################ 


 [[User:JDOG555|JDOG555]] ([[User talk:JDOG555|talk]]) 14:52, 12 August 2009 (UTC)
________________________________________________________________________________
 


 ################################################################################ 


":Attributing competing views, is not unsourced commentary or opinions. You appear now to simply want to make [[WP:POINT|a point]] and as I have pointed out about, been reduced to [[NPA|personal attacks]] and [[WP:CIVIL|incilility]]. You have been afforded the oppertunity to provide sources, and the issues has been flagged since 2007. You have ignored the last two [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Plantation_of_Ulster#.22Citation_Needed.22_--_Not sections and discussions] and blindly reverted. Stop now, --<font face=""Celtic"">[[User:Domer48|<span style=""color:#009900""><strong>Domer48</strong></span>]]<sub>''[[User talk:Domer48|<span style=""color:#006600"">'fenian'</span>]]''</sub></font> 15:07, 26 January 2009 (UTC)NEWLINENEWLINE"
________________________________________________________________________________
":Attributing competing views, is not unsourced commentary or opinions. You appear now to simply want to make a point and as I have pointed out about, been reduced to personal attacks and incilility. You have been afforded the oppertunity to provide sources, and the issues has been flagged since 2007. You have ignored the last two sections and discussions and blindly reverted. Stop now, 'fenian' 

"


 ################################################################################ 


yes
________________________________________________________________________________
yes


 ################################################################################ 


"NEWLINENEWLINE== ''Dracorex Hogwartsia'' ""did you know"" not consistent with article ==NEWLINENEWLINEAccording to the corresponding article, the dinosaur called ''Dracorex Hogwartsia'' was ''not'' named for the Hungarian Horntail in Harry Potter (it says so just that explicitly), but was just inspired by the series in some more general way. I think an admin ought to remove this from the main page, or, since it is interesting, keep but rewrite the sentence."
________________________________________________________________________________
"

 Dracorex Hogwartsia ""did you know"" not consistent with article 

According to the corresponding article, the dinosaur called Dracorex Hogwartsia was not named for the Hungarian Horntail in Harry Potter (it says so just that explicitly), but was just inspired by the series in some more general way. I think an admin ought to remove this from the main page, or, since it is interesting, keep but rewrite the sentence."


 ################################################################################ 


WPAVIATION|class=|Airlines-project=yes
________________________________________________________________________________
WPAVIATION|class=|Airlines-project=yes


 ################################################################################ 


 NEWLINENEWLINE
________________________________________________________________________________
 


 ################################################################################ 


Start
________________________________________________________________________________
Start


 ################################################################################ 


"NEWLINENEWLINE{{divbox|grey|Cross posted from NPOV noticeboard|NEWLINE:This is a very well known book and writing a good article about it is easy so long as you keep it simple. Obviously include all the facts about the book's publication, and then cover the contents. Then you should have a section on ""reception"". It should include reviews of the book in the important media, from all viewpoints. Just state what the reviews said, e.g. ""X, writing in Y, said that the most important contribution of the book was that it .... However, he wished that it had ...."". It's very important to reflect the exact tone of each review, i.e. don't pick out an isolated favourable comment from a review that was mainly critical. Give most space to the reviews in the print and broadcast media, less to those in web-only media unless they are highly respected. [[User:Itsmejudith|Itsmejudith]] ([[User talk:Itsmejudith|talk]]) 08:21, 22 June 2008 (UTC)NEWLINENEWLINE::Excellent advice.  I think the major concern is that the book itself is a whistleblower's account of what happened in a political environment, and as such we have plenty of commentary from subjects that may be notable, but are definitely completely unconnected to the events, the book, or the author.  It's easy for politicians to make statements (both positive and negative) with political motivations rather than having any actual connection.  Since that is the case, I strongly believe that we should limit opinions injected into the article to people who are actually connected to the subject.  You bring up some excellent points, and I'm going to cross post this conversation there.  I would request additional comments be directed to the [[Talk:What Happened#Request for Comment: Undue Weight|open RFC]]. /[[USER:Blaxthos|Blaxthos]] <small>( [[User Talk:Blaxthos|t]] / [[Special:Contributions/Blaxthos|c]] )</small> 20:23, 22 June 2008 (UTC)NEWLINE}}"
________________________________________________________________________________
"

"


 ################################################################################ 


":Obviously you have not read Caragounis references and notes. The Glareanus story is fully documented bellow.NEWLINENEWLINE:""5 The story of the fraud (fraude) to which Erasmus fell victim is related in an account dated 27 October 1569, and cited in one of the fervent supporters of Erasmianism, in Gerardi Ioannis Vossii, Aristarchus, sive de arte Grammatica libri septem etc., (Amstelædami: I. Blaev 1635, Editio secunda 1662) 106f. My thanks are hereby due to de heer Martin Engels, Conservator of the Provinciale Bibliotheek van Friesland at Leeuwarden, Netherlands, who kindly send me photocopies of the relevant pages of this book. The text runs as follows: ""Ac Erasmus quidem quâ occasione ad scribendum de rectâ pronunciatione fuerit impulsus, paucis cognitum arbitror. Itaque visum hâc de adjicere, quod in schedâ quadam habeo, scriptâ olim manu Henrici Coracopetræi, viri egregiè docti, doctisque perfamiliaris. Ea ita habet: ‘Audivi M. Rutgerum Reschium, professorem Linguæ Græcæ in Collegio Buslidiano apud Lovanienses, meum piæ memoriæ præceptorem, narrantem, se habitâsse in Liliensi pædagogio unà cum Erasmo, plus minus biennio eo superius, se inferius cubiculum obtinente: Henricum autem Glareanum Parisiis Lovanium venisse, atque ab Erasmo in collegium vocatum fuisse ad prandium: quò cùm venisset, quid novi adferret interrogatum, dixisse (quod in itinere commentus erat, quòd sciret Erasmum plus satis rerum novarum studiosum, ac mirè credulum) quosdam in Græciâ natos Lutetiam venisse, viros ad miraculum doctos; qui longè aliam Græci sermonis pronunciationem usurparent, quàm quæ vulgò in hisce partibus recepta esset. Eos nempe sonare pro B vita, BETA: pro H ita, ETA: pro ai æ, AI: pro OI I, OI: & sic in cæteris. Quo audito, Erasmum paulò pòst conscripsisse Dialogum de rectâ Latini Græcique sermonis pronunciatione, ut videretur hujus rei ipse inventor, & obtulisse Petro Alostensi, typographo, imprimendum: qui cùm, fortè aliis occupatus, renueret; aut certè se tam citò excudere, quàm ipse volebat, non posse diceret; misisse libellum Basileam ad Frobenium, a quo mox impressus in lucem prodiit. Verùm Erasmum, cognitâ fraude, nunquam eâ pronunciandi ratione postea usum; nec amicis, quibuscum familiariter vivebat, ut eam observarent, præcepisse. In ejus rei fidem exhibuit M. Rutgerus ipsius Erasmi manuscriptam in gratiam Damiani à Goes Hispani pronunciationis formulam (cujus exemplar adhuc apud me est) in nullo diversam ab eâ, quâ passim docti & indocti in hac linguâ utuntur’. Henricus Coracopetræus Cuccensis. Neomagi. CI I LXIX. pridie Simonis & Iudæ."" "" --[[User:81.178.246.24|81.178.246.24]] 05:18, 20 November 2005 (UTC)NEWLINENEWLINENEWLINE"
________________________________________________________________________________
":Obviously you have not read Caragounis references and notes. The Glareanus story is fully documented bellow.

""5 The story of the fraud (fraude) to which Erasmus fell victim is related in an account dated 27 October 1569, and cited in one of the fervent supporters of Erasmianism, in Gerardi Ioannis Vossii, Aristarchus, sive de arte Grammatica libri septem etc., (Amstelædami: I. Blaev 1635, Editio secunda 1662) 106f. My thanks are hereby due to de heer Martin Engels, Conservator of the Provinciale Bibliotheek van Friesland at Leeuwarden, Netherlands, who kindly send me photocopies of the relevant pages of this book. The text runs as follows: ""Ac Erasmus quidem quâ occasione ad scribendum de rectâ pronunciatione fuerit impulsus, paucis cognitum arbitror. Itaque visum hâc de adjicere, quod in schedâ quadam habeo, scriptâ olim manu Henrici Coracopetræi, viri egregiè docti, doctisque perfamiliaris. Ea ita habet: ‘Audivi M. Rutgerum Reschium, professorem Linguæ Græcæ in Collegio Buslidiano apud Lovanienses, meum piæ memoriæ præceptorem, narrantem, se habitâsse in Liliensi pædagogio unà cum Erasmo, plus minus biennio eo superius, se inferius cubiculum obtinente: Henricum autem Glareanum Parisiis Lovanium venisse, atque ab Erasmo in collegium vocatum fuisse ad prandium: quò cùm venisset, quid novi adferret interrogatum, dixisse (quod in itinere commentus erat, quòd sciret Erasmum plus satis rerum novarum studiosum, ac mirè credulum) quosdam in Græciâ natos Lutetiam venisse, viros ad miraculum doctos; qui longè aliam Græci sermonis pronunciationem usurparent, quàm quæ vulgò in hisce partibus recepta esset. Eos nempe sonare pro B vita, BETA: pro H ita, ETA: pro ai æ, AI: pro OI I, OI: & sic in cæteris. Quo audito, Erasmum paulò pòst conscripsisse Dialogum de rectâ Latini Græcique sermonis pronunciatione, ut videretur hujus rei ipse inventor, & obtulisse Petro Alostensi, typographo, imprimendum: qui cùm, fortè aliis occupatus, renueret; aut certè se tam citò excudere, quàm ipse volebat, non posse diceret; misisse libellum Basileam ad Frobenium, a quo mox impressus in lucem prodiit. Verùm Erasmum, cognitâ fraude, nunquam eâ pronunciandi ratione postea usum; nec amicis, quibuscum familiariter vivebat, ut eam observarent, præcepisse. In ejus rei fidem exhibuit M. Rutgerus ipsius Erasmi manuscriptam in gratiam Damiani à Goes Hispani pronunciationis formulam (cujus exemplar adhuc apud me est) in nullo diversam ab eâ, quâ passim docti & indocti in hac linguâ utuntur’. Henricus Coracopetræus Cuccensis. Neomagi. CI I LXIX. pridie Simonis & Iudæ."" ""  

"


 ################################################################################ 


Alex
________________________________________________________________________________
Alex


 ################################################################################ 


           NEWLINE
________________________________________________________________________________
 


 ################################################################################ 


"NEWLINENEWLINE== copyright infringement ==NEWLINENEWLINEIn response to the notification ""This page may meet Wikipedia’s criteria for speedy deletion as a copyright infringement of http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pt.2003.08.003 Box 1 The N equals 1 fallacy"" I would like to respond that we are the authors of the paper in question which we published in ""trends in parasitology"" in 2003. To avoid potential copyright issues I will rephrase the sentences in question."
________________________________________________________________________________
"

 copyright infringement 

In response to the notification ""This page may meet Wikipedia’s criteria for speedy deletion as a copyright infringement of http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pt.2003.08.003 Box 1 The N equals 1 fallacy"" I would like to respond that we are the authors of the paper in question which we published in ""trends in parasitology"" in 2003. To avoid potential copyright issues I will rephrase the sentences in question."


 ################################################################################ 


NEWLINE::Nevermind...The page is protected now until the vandalism is over. Well this is a reason to celebrate!!! [[User:Typer 525|Typer525]] 04:15, 29 March 2006 (UTC)
________________________________________________________________________________
Nevermind...The page is protected now until the vandalism is over. Well this is a reason to celebrate!!!  


 ################################################################################ 


stub
________________________________________________________________________________
stub


 ################################################################################ 


 |class=Start
________________________________________________________________________________
 |class=Start


 ################################################################################ 


"::It's customary, when making a ""not necessarily"" argument, to follow up with a counterexample. The counterexample would really drive your point home. As it is, we're just left trying to imagine what symmetric propulsion system you have in mind.  [[User:Spiel496|Spiel496]] ([[User talk:Spiel496|talk]]) 04:58, 10 November 2015 (UTC)NEWLINENEWLINE"
________________________________________________________________________________
"::It's customary, when making a ""not necessarily"" argument, to follow up with a counterexample. The counterexample would really drive your point home. As it is, we're just left trying to imagine what symmetric propulsion system you have in mind.    

"


 ################################################################################ 


NEWLINE:Well, I am right here in Singapore, and no, the rumours of a mass protest in Kallang didnt quite materialise, did it? I am fully aware of the general sense of unhappiness amongst locals, but this can indeed by presented in an NPOV manner. There was an ST article recently which seems like a good basis for comparison, although we do need to adopt an even more nuetral and professional tone here. Wikipedia can be a source for political information, and it can discuss views of the populance. That said, it cannot be abused to read like a one-sided personal writeup either. Singaporeans are entitled to a choice, yes, but that does not amount to the abuse of various avenues of expression around the world.--[[User:Huaiwei|Huaiwei]] 08:52, 17 August 2005 (UTC)
________________________________________________________________________________
Well, I am right here in Singapore, and no, the rumours of a mass protest in Kallang didnt quite materialise, did it? I am fully aware of the general sense of unhappiness amongst locals, but this can indeed by presented in an NPOV manner. There was an ST article recently which seems like a good basis for comparison, although we do need to adopt an even more nuetral and professional tone here. Wikipedia can be a source for political information, and it can discuss views of the populance. That said, it cannot be abused to read like a one-sided personal writeup either. Singaporeans are entitled to a choice, yes, but that does not amount to the abuse of various avenues of expression around the world. 


 ################################################################################ 


I suggest soliciting the help of Admin Sancho to decipher this matter; he seems to be very organized and scholarly in his approach.  
________________________________________________________________________________
I suggest soliciting the help of Admin Sancho to decipher this matter; he seems to be very organized and scholarly in his approach.  


 ################################################################################ 


54
________________________________________________________________________________
54


 ################################################################################ 


|section=Hitz Radio !! reason=Many reversions between two versions !! time=15:44, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
________________________________________________________________________________
|section=Hitz Radio !! reason=Many reversions between two versions !! time=


 ################################################################################ 


photo|date=October 2011
________________________________________________________________________________
photo|date=October 2011


 ################################################################################ 


"::::::paragraphs by Haan page 39 NEWLINE:::::::""''The intensity with which someone desires Knowledge is seen of utmost importance, including when assessing if somebody is ripe for Knowledge. ""As soon as somebody really wants Knowledge, he will receive it"", it is said. But this is on the condition that the mind is bypassed. As long as the mind rules supreme there will be always ""concepts"" that try to take away the desire for Knowledge. ''NEWLINE:::::::''The premie community defines the word ""mind"" as being conditioned i.e. all influences that make man wander away from his true nature.''NEWLINE:::::::''Sometimes the battle against this word degenerates in complete irrationality. Every criticism and objective approach is then branded as ""mined"". If somebody feels bad or did not have good experiences for a long time during meditation, then the person is ""in his mind"". Discussions with outsiders are often avoided, because this could possibly stimulate the mind''""NEWLINE::::::[[User:Andries|Andries]] 08:34, 18 Sep 2004 (UTC)NEWLINENEWLINE"
________________________________________________________________________________
"::::::paragraphs by Haan page 39 
""The intensity with which someone desires Knowledge is seen of utmost importance, including when assessing if somebody is ripe for Knowledge. ""As soon as somebody really wants Knowledge, he will receive it"", it is said. But this is on the condition that the mind is bypassed. As long as the mind rules supreme there will be always ""concepts"" that try to take away the desire for Knowledge. 
The premie community defines the word ""mind"" as being conditioned i.e. all influences that make man wander away from his true nature.
Sometimes the battle against this word degenerates in complete irrationality. Every criticism and objective approach is then branded as ""mined"". If somebody feels bad or did not have good experiences for a long time during meditation, then the person is ""in his mind"". Discussions with outsiders are often avoided, because this could possibly stimulate the mind""
 08:34, 18 Sep 2004 (UTC)

"


 ################################################################################ 


in Syria 
________________________________________________________________________________
in Syria 


 ################################################################################ 


"NEWLINE:::::::::You also can't have sources to explain things that are a matter of common sense. Maybe then, we should have a source for the line ""Linguistics encompasses of a number of sub fields."" Please find a source for that. Why should I believe you or not think it is ''ad hoc'' that linguistics has different sub fields and isn't one big sea of gurgling information? Is this community's intelligence so poor? This is not an issue to be wasting talk space over in the first place, and neither is anyone seeming to attempt arriving at consensus because it is a '''non issue'''. I feel as if I'm writing to five year olds. [[User:Squarrels|Squarrels]] ([[User talk:Squarrels|talk]]) 10:15, 31 October 2010 (UTC)"
________________________________________________________________________________
"
You also can't have sources to explain things that are a matter of common sense. Maybe then, we should have a source for the line ""Linguistics encompasses of a number of sub fields."" Please find a source for that. Why should I believe you or not think it is ad hoc that linguistics has different sub fields and isn't one big sea of gurgling information? Is this community's intelligence so poor? This is not an issue to be wasting talk space over in the first place, and neither is anyone seeming to attempt arriving at consensus because it is a non issue. I feel as if I'm writing to five year olds.   "


 ################################################################################ 


|importance=low
________________________________________________________________________________
|importance=low


 ################################################################################ 


}}NEWLINE{{WikiProject United States
________________________________________________________________________________
}}
{{WikiProject United States


 ################################################################################ 


"15:09, 21 September 2006 (UTC)NEWLINENEWLINEA year after the event the government finally admitted that the whole family had been killed, though they tried to blame the Social Revolutionaries for the act, claiming that they did so in order to discredit the Bolsheviks.  But the links between the Urals and Moscow was later made patently clear by Trotsky:NEWLINENEWLINE""My next visit to Moscow took place after the fall of Ekaterinburg.  Talking to Sverdlov, I asked in passing: 'Oh, yes, and where is the Tsar?NEWLINE'It's all over,' he answered.  'He has been shot.'NEWLINE'And where is the family?'NEWLINE'And the family along with him.'NEWLINE'All of them?', I asked, apparently with a touch of surprise.NEWLINE'All of them,' replied Sverdlov. 'What about it?' He was waiting to see my reaction, I made no reply.NEWLINE'And who made the decision?', I asked.NEWLINE'We decided it here.  Ilych [Lenin] believed that we shouldn't leave the Whites a live banner to rally round, especially under the present difficult circumstances.'NEWLINEI did not ask any further questions and considered the matter closed.  Actually, the decision was not only expedient but necessary.  The severity of the summary justice (sic) showed the world that we would continue to fight mercilessly, stopping at nothing.  The execution of the Tsar's family was needed not only in order to frighten, horrify, and dishearten the enemy, but also in order to shake up our own ranks to show that there was no turning back, that ahead lay only complete victory or complete ruin...This Lenin sensed well.""NEWLINENEWLINE: We have only Trotsky's word for this. Also, the historical records show that Trotsky was actually in Moscow at the time of the executions, not at the front as he claimed, so he got that bit of the story  wrong.... Also in a later book he told a completely different story about the executions, claiming that Stalin ordered them! [[User:Colin4C|Colin4C]] 15:09, 21 September 2006 (UTC)NEWLINENEWLINENeither Lenin nor Sverdlov had been 'hoodwinked'; and as the Communist regime grew in strength they showed their pride in the act by renaming Ekaterinburg as Sverdlovsk.NEWLINENEWLINE:'the Communist regime', maybe, but not Lenin, he did not live long enough to see Stalin's perversions of his ideals [[User:Colin4C|Colin4C]] 15:09, 21 September 2006 (UTC)   NEWLINE[[User:White Guard|White Guard]] 23:11, 20 September 2006 (UTC)NEWLINENEWLINE== What Is To Be Done? ==NEWLINENEWLINEOh dear, oh dear; this whole article demonstrates a quite ''appalling'' political bias.  NEWLINENEWLINEHere are some of the worst examples;NEWLINENEWLINECONSTITUENT ASSEMBLY.  We are told that the Bolsheviks closed down the Constituent Assembly ""with the backing of the overwhelming majority of the workers in both of Russia's major cities"", though this simply glosses over the fact that this was another coup, comparable to that of October 1917, designed to ensure that a political minority retained control of absolute power. The 'dictatorship of the proletariat' was, in practice, never more than the dictatorship of the Bolshevik Party.  Quotations are used here to support a distinctly political-and undemocratic act-as an intellectual and historical necessity.  This is the worst example of manipulation and bias that I have ''ever'' come across in Wikipedia.NEWLINENEWLINESOVIET DEMOCRACY.  We are told that Lenin 'advocated and helped to form' a 'Soviet democracy', though the whole drift of Leninism since 1903 had been towards political professionalism and centralised control.  Lenin's concept of 'democratic centralism' militated against effective democracy by silencing debate after decisions had been taken; and the political organisation of the Bolsheviks ensure that the Soviets quickly ceased to represent any dissenting views.NEWLINENEWLINEOPPRESSION.  The Soviet state is defended against the use of secret police and labour camps on the entirely disingenuous grounds that these had been used by the Tsars!  The Russo-Japanese War, Bloody Sunday and World War I are then alluded to for some bizarre and unexplained reason to excuse forms of oppression used by the Bolsheviks.  ""They also mention that the scale of the circumstances which surrounded the Bolsheviks was different as well: a country ravaged by an unprecedentaly destructive world war, a mass of people kept historically illiterate by Tsarist autocracy, an oppositional force that fought to oust the Bolsheviks from power etc.""  Make what you will of that semi-literate and intellectually incoherent nonsense.  Trotsky and a 'river of blood'?  If there was such a river he began the flow.NEWLINENEWLINEWORKERS STATE.  Consider this: ""The Leninist vision of revolution demanded a professional revolutionary cadre that would lead the working class in their conquest of power and centralize economic and administrative power in the hands of a workers state.""  This could be straight out of official Soviet publications from the Brezhnev era.  A
________________________________________________________________________________
"

A year after the event the government finally admitted that the whole family had been killed, though they tried to blame the Social Revolutionaries for the act, claiming that they did so in order to discredit the Bolsheviks.  But the links between the Urals and Moscow was later made patently clear by Trotsky:

""My next visit to Moscow took place after the fall of Ekaterinburg.  Talking to Sverdlov, I asked in passing: 'Oh, yes, and where is the Tsar?
'It's all over,' he answered.  'He has been shot.'
'And where is the family?'
'And the family along with him.'
'All of them?', I asked, apparently with a touch of surprise.
'All of them,' replied Sverdlov. 'What about it?' He was waiting to see my reaction, I made no reply.
'And who made the decision?', I asked.
'We decided it here.  Ilych [Lenin] believed that we shouldn't leave the Whites a live banner to rally round, especially under the present difficult circumstances.'
I did not ask any further questions and considered the matter closed.  Actually, the decision was not only expedient but necessary.  The severity of the summary justice (sic) showed the world that we would continue to fight mercilessly, stopping at nothing.  The execution of the Tsar's family was needed not only in order to frighten, horrify, and dishearten the enemy, but also in order to shake up our own ranks to show that there was no turning back, that ahead lay only complete victory or complete ruin...This Lenin sensed well.""

 We have only Trotsky's word for this. Also, the historical records show that Trotsky was actually in Moscow at the time of the executions, not at the front as he claimed, so he got that bit of the story  wrong.... Also in a later book he told a completely different story about the executions, claiming that Stalin ordered them!  

Neither Lenin nor Sverdlov had been 'hoodwinked'; and as the Communist regime grew in strength they showed their pride in the act by renaming Ekaterinburg as Sverdlovsk.

'the Communist regime', maybe, but not Lenin, he did not live long enough to see Stalin's perversions of his ideals     
 

 What Is To Be Done? 

Oh dear, oh dear; this whole article demonstrates a quite appalling political bias.  

Here are some of the worst examples;

CONSTITUENT ASSEMBLY.  We are told that the Bolsheviks closed down the Constituent Assembly ""with the backing of the overwhelming majority of the workers in both of Russia's major cities"", though this simply glosses over the fact that this was another coup, comparable to that of October 1917, designed to ensure that a political minority retained control of absolute power. The 'dictatorship of the proletariat' was, in practice, never more than the dictatorship of the Bolshevik Party.  Quotations are used here to support a distinctly political-and undemocratic act-as an intellectual and historical necessity.  This is the worst example of manipulation and bias that I have ever come across in Wikipedia.

SOVIET DEMOCRACY.  We are told that Lenin 'advocated and helped to form' a 'Soviet democracy', though the whole drift of Leninism since 1903 had been towards political professionalism and centralised control.  Lenin's concept of 'democratic centralism' militated against effective democracy by silencing debate after decisions had been taken; and the political organisation of the Bolsheviks ensure that the Soviets quickly ceased to represent any dissenting views.

OPPRESSION.  The Soviet state is defended against the use of secret police and labour camps on the entirely disingenuous grounds that these had been used by the Tsars!  The Russo-Japanese War, Bloody Sunday and World War I are then alluded to for some bizarre and unexplained reason to excuse forms of oppression used by the Bolsheviks.  ""They also mention that the scale of the circumstances which surrounded the Bolsheviks was different as well: a country ravaged by an unprecedentaly destructive world war, a mass of people kept historically illiterate by Tsarist autocracy, an oppositional force that fought to oust the Bolsheviks from power etc.""  Make what you will of that semi-literate and intellectually incoherent nonsense.  Trotsky and a 'river of blood'?  If there was such a river he began the flow.

WORKERS STATE.  Consider this: ""The Leninist vision of revolution demanded a professional revolutionary cadre that would lead the working class in their conquest of power and centralize economic and administrative power in the hands of a workers state.""  This could be straight out of official Soviet publications from the Brezhnev era.  A


 ################################################################################ 


NEWLINENEWLINEI've found the source, for your info. :) http://www.lovehkfilm.com/people/ng_francis.htmNEWLINE[[User:Ondog|Ondog]] 07:58, 2 February 2006 (UTC)
________________________________________________________________________________
I've found the source, for your info. ) http://www.lovehkfilm.com/people/ng_francis.htm
 


 ################################################################################ 


|importance=low
________________________________________________________________________________
|importance=low


 ################################################################################ 


}}NEWLINE{{WPMED|class=stub|importance=mid|dermatology=yes
________________________________________________________________________________
}}
{{WPMED|class=stub|importance=mid|dermatology=yes


 ################################################################################ 


NEWLINENEWLINEThere were no protests, just riots, in order to loot and steal. It just shows the world what Tibetans under the dalai lama are like, perhaps western countries want to have these riots in their own countries, like the riots in Paris and other French cities.
________________________________________________________________________________
There were no protests, just riots, in order to loot and steal. It just shows the world what Tibetans under the dalai lama are like, perhaps western countries want to have these riots in their own countries, like the riots in Paris and other French cities.


 ################################################################################ 


NEWLINENEWLINEWhoops, forgot to sign my edit [[Special:Contributions/58.175.33.82|58.175.33.82]] ([[User talk:58.175.33.82|talk]]) 08:26, 24 January 2012 (UTC)
________________________________________________________________________________
Whoops, forgot to sign my edit 58.175.33.82  


 ################################################################################ 


NEWLINENEWLINEShouldt this article be merged with [[Min-max theorem]], which treats the same topic in more depth?NEWLINEKjetil B Halvorsen 17:12, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
________________________________________________________________________________
Shouldt this article be merged with Min-max theorem, which treats the same topic in more depth?
Kjetil B Halvorsen 


 ################################################################################ 


"NEWLINENEWLINE:You're an editor also. But no, readers don't have the right to know the identities of people in photos in public places. [[WP:CENSORED]] is about ""content that some readers consider objectionable or offensive, even exceedingly so (see Wikipedia:Content disclaimer). Wikipedia cannot guarantee that articles or images will always be acceptable to all readers, or that they will adhere to general social or religious norms.  [[User:Dougweller|Dougweller]] ([[User talk:Dougweller|talk]]) 19:04, 13 March 2014 (UTC)"
________________________________________________________________________________
"

You're an editor also. But no, readers don't have the right to know the identities of people in photos in public places. WP:CENSORED is about ""content that some readers consider objectionable or offensive, even exceedingly so (see Wikipedia:Content disclaimer). Wikipedia cannot guarantee that articles or images will always be acceptable to all readers, or that they will adhere to general social or religious norms.    "


 ################################################################################ 


NEWLINE}}
________________________________________________________________________________
}}


 ################################################################################ 


"NEWLINENEWLINE== arrest procedures/Fagan incident ==NEWLINENEWLINEIf you can't ""execute judicial processes"" within royal palaces, how was Michael Fagan apprehended by the police after breaking into Buckingham Palace and speaking to the Queen? Did they seriously have to drag him outside to place him under arrest and caution? [[Special:Contributions/74.69.121.132|74.69.121.132]] ([[User talk:74.69.121.132|talk]]) 14:38, 14 May 2013 (UTC)"
________________________________________________________________________________
"

 arrest procedures/Fagan incident 

If you can't ""execute judicial processes"" within royal palaces, how was Michael Fagan apprehended by the police after breaking into Buckingham Palace and speaking to the Queen? Did they seriously have to drag him outside to place him under arrest and caution? 74.69.121.132  "


 ################################################################################ 


yes|afl-importance=low
________________________________________________________________________________
yes|afl-importance=low


 ################################################################################ 


MPS
________________________________________________________________________________
MPS


 ################################################################################ 


NEWLINENEWLINEThis article states that this Sir Hugh was both 2nd and 10th Earl of Devon; a note of explanation would be helpful.[[Special:Contributions/125.239.109.62|125.239.109.62]] ([[User talk:125.239.109.62|talk]]) 01:50, 1 January 2013 (UTC)
________________________________________________________________________________
This article states that this Sir Hugh was both 2nd and 10th Earl of Devon; a note of explanation would be helpful.125.239.109.62  


 ################################################################################ 


"NEWLINENEWLINE== More State Actions on Diploma Mills ==NEWLINENEWLINEIn addition to the Alabama actions on diploma mills, New Jersey has also been active, sending cease and desist orders to Breyer State ""degree"" holders.NEWLINENEWLINEwww.nj.com/news/ledger/jersey/index.ssf?...NEWLINENEWLINE9/4/2008NEWLINEThree Freehold Regional school administrators who gained advanced degrees from a suspected ""diploma mill"" were ordered by the state yesterday to remove the degrees from their titles, while the state also alerted all districts to the laws against using such institutions. NEWLINEThe state Commission on Higher Education sent the ""cease-and-desist"" letters to Freehold Superintendent James Wasser and two of his assistants who had gained doctorates from Breyer State University, an online program that had at least twice lost its certification.NEWLINENEWLINE[[User:Captinron|Captinron]] ([[User talk:Captinron|talk]]) 21:37, 2 December 2008 (UTC)"
________________________________________________________________________________
"

 More State Actions on Diploma Mills 

In addition to the Alabama actions on diploma mills, New Jersey has also been active, sending cease and desist orders to Breyer State ""degree"" holders.

www.nj.com/news/ledger/jersey/index.ssf?...

9/4/2008
Three Freehold Regional school administrators who gained advanced degrees from a suspected ""diploma mill"" were ordered by the state yesterday to remove the degrees from their titles, while the state also alerted all districts to the laws against using such institutions. 
The state Commission on Higher Education sent the ""cease-and-desist"" letters to Freehold Superintendent James Wasser and two of his assistants who had gained doctorates from Breyer State University, an online program that had at least twice lost its certification.

  "


 ################################################################################ 


"NEWLINE::: You've stated it yourself, it's very hard to search using just ""Tiffany"", since you'd need a variety of search terms added to it. So, I stand by the statement made above, which newspaper writers also say. -- [[Special:Contributions/67.70.35.44|67.70.35.44]] ([[User talk:67.70.35.44|talk]]) 05:27, 8 December 2014 (UTC)"
________________________________________________________________________________
"
 You've stated it yourself, it's very hard to search using just ""Tiffany"", since you'd need a variety of search terms added to it. So, I stand by the statement made above, which newspaper writers also say.  67.70.35.44  "


 ################################################################################ 


mid
________________________________________________________________________________
mid


 ################################################################################ 


"NEWLINENEWLINE:::Ooops! Yes, I realised the moment I'd clicked on the ""Save page"" button! Thanks! <small>--<span style=""font-family: Trebuchet MS, sans-serif;border:2px solid #A9A9A9;padding:1px;"">[[User:Jza84|<b>Jza84</b>]] | [[User_talk: Jza84|<font style=""color:#000000;background:#D3D3D3;"">&nbsp;Talk&nbsp;</font>]] </span></small> 20:43, 23 May 2008 (UTC)"
________________________________________________________________________________
"

Ooops! Yes, I realised the moment I'd clicked on the ""Save page"" button! Thanks!  |  Talk   "


 ################################################################################ 


[[User:Truther truther|Truther truther]] ([[User talk:Truther truther|talk]]) 21:32, 4 December 2007 (UTC)NEWLINE
________________________________________________________________________________
 


 ################################################################################ 


move
________________________________________________________________________________
move


 ################################################################################ 


"NEWLINENEWLINE7) The first sentence in the section [[India House#Transformation]] begins:NEWLINENEWLINE*The umbrella organisation of India House, which now included the Abhinav Bharat Society and its relatively peaceful front the Free India Society...NEWLINENEWLINEUnless I missed it, this is the first time in the article that you use the phrase ""umbrella organization"" in reference to India House. So, when you say ""which ''now'' included the Abhinav Bharat Society, etc."", the reader is left wondering, ""What was it before this?"" You need either to use that phrase earlier in the article (and say what it was, or included) or explain here what it included ''before'' additional groups were included. Otherwise, you need to remove the word ""now"".NEWLINENEWLINE8) The next sentence in that section is:NEWLINENEWLINE*Unlike the latter, it became wholly self-reliant in finances, organisation, as well as ideological mores.NEWLINENEWLINE(a) It's not clear to what the pronoun ""it"" refers. Does it refer to ""the umbrella organization"" or to ""India House""? Likewise ""it in the next sentence.NEWLINENEWLINE(b) Also, I can understand how an organization can become self-reliant with regard to finances and organization, but I find it more difficult to understand how an organization can become self-reliant with regard to ""ideological mores"".NEWLINENEWLINE(c) Finally, it's not completely clear what you mean by ""ideological mores"". The word ""mores"" means customs, ways of doing things in society. It's not usually associated with political ideas.NEWLINENEWLINE9) Later in that same paragraph you have this sentence:NEWLINENEWLINE*The Sunday night meetings were selected for lectures by Savarkar...NEWLINENEWLINEI don't understand this. I don't understand ""The...meetings were selected for lectures"".NEWLINENEWLINE10) The first sentence in the fourth paragraph in [[India House#Transformation]] is the following:NEWLINENEWLINE*The deliveries of weapons to India included, among others, a number of Browning pistols sent through Chaturbhuj Amin, Chanjeri Rao, and through V.V.S. Iyer when he returned to India.NEWLINENEWLINEThe addition of ""through"" before ""V.V.S. Iyer"" makes the adverbial clause ""when he returned to India"" apply only to Iyer. Does that mean that the other two did not return to India? If so, then how could they have facilitated the transport of weapons to India? As you can see, this sentence needs some attention.NEWLINENEWLINE11) The last paragraph in [[India House#Transformation]] is:NEWLINENEWLINE*By 1908, the India House group had overtaken the London Indian Society (LIS), established in 1865 by Dadabhoi Naoroji, until then the largest association of Indians in London. Subsequently, India House took over the control of LIS when, at the annual general meeting that year, members of India House packed the gathering and ousted the old guard of the society.NEWLINENEWLINEAlthough the two sentences are probably about two different things, the use of ""had overtaken"" in the first sentence and ""took over"" in the second might make the reader think that the two sentences are saying something similar but with different words. Also, ""had overtaken"" is not completely clear. Does it mean ""had overtaken in numbers of members"", or membership, or does it mean ""took control of""? If it means the first one, then I would add some words to clarify it.NEWLINENEWLINE12) The first sentence of the second paragraph in [[India House#Culmination]] is:NEWLINENEWLINE*In the aftermath of the assassination, India House was rapidly shut down. NEWLINENEWLINEThe last sentence of that paragraph is:NEWLINENEWLINE*TheParis Indian Society gradually took India House's place as the centre of Indian nationalism on the continent.NEWLINENEWLINEI don't see how the Paris Indian Society taking India House's place as the centre of Indian nationalism could have been gradual, given that India House was ""rapidly shut down"". You need either to delete ""gradually"" or give a brief explanation as to why it was gradual and not immediate.NEWLINENEWLINE13) In the section [[India House#Department of Criminal Intelligence]], I see ""V.V.S. Aiyer"". Is this the same person whose name is spelled earlier in the article as ""V.V.S. Iyer""? This needs to be resolved and all spellings of the name made consistent.NEWLINENEWLINE14) Also in the section [[India House#Department of Criminal Intelligence]], we read:NEWLINENEWLINE*C's reports noted that Savarkar's speeches grew increasingly strident and called for revolution, widespread violence, and murder of all Englishmen in India.NEWLINENEWLINEEarlier in the article you have the exact same words as the part after ""noted that"". Do you really want to say the same thing twice?NEWLINENEWLINE15) The next two sentences are:NEWLINENEWLINE*In the following weeks, Savarkar was barred from joining the bar due to his political activity. These events led to the assassination of Sir Curzon Wyllie. NEWLINENEWLINEIt is no
________________________________________________________________________________
"

7) The first sentence in the section India House#Transformation begins:

The umbrella organisation of India House, which now included the Abhinav Bharat Society and its relatively peaceful front the Free India Society...

Unless I missed it, this is the first time in the article that you use the phrase ""umbrella organization"" in reference to India House. So, when you say ""which now included the Abhinav Bharat Society, etc."", the reader is left wondering, ""What was it before this?"" You need either to use that phrase earlier in the article (and say what it was, or included) or explain here what it included before additional groups were included. Otherwise, you need to remove the word ""now"".

8) The next sentence in that section is:

Unlike the latter, it became wholly self-reliant in finances, organisation, as well as ideological mores.

(a) It's not clear to what the pronoun ""it"" refers. Does it refer to ""the umbrella organization"" or to ""India House""? Likewise ""it in the next sentence.

(b) Also, I can understand how an organization can become self-reliant with regard to finances and organization, but I find it more difficult to understand how an organization can become self-reliant with regard to ""ideological mores"".

(c) Finally, it's not completely clear what you mean by ""ideological mores"". The word ""mores"" means customs, ways of doing things in society. It's not usually associated with political ideas.

9) Later in that same paragraph you have this sentence:

The Sunday night meetings were selected for lectures by Savarkar...

I don't understand this. I don't understand ""The...meetings were selected for lectures"".

10) The first sentence in the fourth paragraph in India House#Transformation is the following:

The deliveries of weapons to India included, among others, a number of Browning pistols sent through Chaturbhuj Amin, Chanjeri Rao, and through V.V.S. Iyer when he returned to India.

The addition of ""through"" before ""V.V.S. Iyer"" makes the adverbial clause ""when he returned to India"" apply only to Iyer. Does that mean that the other two did not return to India? If so, then how could they have facilitated the transport of weapons to India? As you can see, this sentence needs some attention.

11) The last paragraph in India House#Transformation is:

By 1908, the India House group had overtaken the London Indian Society (LIS), established in 1865 by Dadabhoi Naoroji, until then the largest association of Indians in London. Subsequently, India House took over the control of LIS when, at the annual general meeting that year, members of India House packed the gathering and ousted the old guard of the society.

Although the two sentences are probably about two different things, the use of ""had overtaken"" in the first sentence and ""took over"" in the second might make the reader think that the two sentences are saying something similar but with different words. Also, ""had overtaken"" is not completely clear. Does it mean ""had overtaken in numbers of members"", or membership, or does it mean ""took control of""? If it means the first one, then I would add some words to clarify it.

12) The first sentence of the second paragraph in India House#Culmination is:

In the aftermath of the assassination, India House was rapidly shut down. 

The last sentence of that paragraph is:

TheParis Indian Society gradually took India House's place as the centre of Indian nationalism on the continent.

I don't see how the Paris Indian Society taking India House's place as the centre of Indian nationalism could have been gradual, given that India House was ""rapidly shut down"". You need either to delete ""gradually"" or give a brief explanation as to why it was gradual and not immediate.

13) In the section India House#Department of Criminal Intelligence, I see ""V.V.S. Aiyer"". Is this the same person whose name is spelled earlier in the article as ""V.V.S. Iyer""? This needs to be resolved and all spellings of the name made consistent.

14) Also in the section India House#Department of Criminal Intelligence, we read:

C's reports noted that Savarkar's speeches grew increasingly strident and called for revolution, widespread violence, and murder of all Englishmen in India.

Earlier in the article you have the exact same words as the part after ""noted that"". Do you really want to say the same thing twice?

15) The next two sentences are:

In the following weeks, Savarkar was barred from joining the bar due to his political activity. These events led to the assassination of Sir Curzon Wyllie. 

It is no


 ################################################################################ 


NEWLINEheisthe bombdiggitynodoubt
________________________________________________________________________________
heisthe bombdiggitynodoubt


 ################################################################################ 


collision
________________________________________________________________________________
collision


 ################################################################################ 


"NEWLINE:::In her interview with Peaches Geldolf she says 2 1/2 to 3 [http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ld0ARAJSiDw|""Youtube link""] [[Special:Contributions/62.56.56.214|62.56.56.214]] ([[User talk:62.56.56.214|talk]]) 11:07, 2 April 2010 (UTC)"
________________________________________________________________________________
"
In her interview with Peaches Geldolf she says 2 1/2 to 3 link"" 62.56.56.214  "


 ################################################################################ 


"NEWLINENEWLINENew Information:NEWLINENEWLINEI added quotes by Jerome and Irenaeus in regards to that scholars have suggested that the gospels could have been written in Mark. I also counter-balanced this by centering on Irenaeus's comment which betrays theological motivation rather than attention to record, because it is unlikely that anyone who has not strictly studied what is commonly called the ""New Testament"" would catch the contradiction between his statement and what is recorded, and therefore they would not catch the conflict of interests and that he likely discredited his own witness.[[User:Infinitelink|Infinitelink]] 22:33, 2 December 2006 (UTC)"
________________________________________________________________________________
"

New Information:

I added quotes by Jerome and Irenaeus in regards to that scholars have suggested that the gospels could have been written in Mark. I also counter-balanced this by centering on Irenaeus's comment which betrays theological motivation rather than attention to record, because it is unlikely that anyone who has not strictly studied what is commonly called the ""New Testament"" would catch the contradiction between his statement and what is recorded, and therefore they would not catch the conflict of interests and that he likely discredited his own witness. "


 ################################################################################ 


"Mountjoy - it is not wikipedia's job to go to primary sources and determine what the person's real name was.  We should follow what reliable secondary sources say. I'd add that ""son of France"" is basically never used - if we are going to use it, we should certainly use the untranslated form ""fils de France,"" just as we use ""infant of Spain"" rather than ""son of Spain."" [[User:John Kenney|john k]] ([[User talk:John Kenney|talk]]) 14:22, 19 August 2009 (UTC)NEWLINENEWLINE"
________________________________________________________________________________
"Mountjoy - it is not wikipedia's job to go to primary sources and determine what the person's real name was.  We should follow what reliable secondary sources say. I'd add that ""son of France"" is basically never used - if we are going to use it, we should certainly use the untranslated form ""fils de France,"" just as we use ""infant of Spain"" rather than ""son of Spain.""   

"


 ################################################################################ 


|WWI=yesNEWLINE
________________________________________________________________________________
|WWI=yes


 ################################################################################ 


NEWLINENEWLINE== About recent studies ==NEWLINEThe article should contain a recent study in ''Journal of Clinical Psychiatry'' about the '''direct''' influence to people of suicide tendency from improperly handled suicide news reports. Researches before only proves the '''indirect''' influence, but this proves both direct and indirect effect. --[[User:RekishiEJ|RekishiEJ]] ([[User talk:RekishiEJ|talk]]) 07:54, 6 September 2008 (UTC)
________________________________________________________________________________
 About recent studies 
The article should contain a recent study in Journal of Clinical Psychiatry about the direct influence to people of suicide tendency from improperly handled suicide news reports. Researches before only proves the indirect influence, but this proves both direct and indirect effect.   


 ################################################################################ 


Anan
________________________________________________________________________________
Anan


 ################################################################################ 


NEWLINENEWLINE== Protection for this article? ==NEWLINEOMG administrators shall semi-protect the [[RMS Titanic]] artcie because there were too many vandalisms committed by IP addresses/anonymous users. NEWLINE([[User:Japee|Japee]] ([[User talk:Japee|talk]]) 10:41, 8 September 2009 (UTC)
________________________________________________________________________________
 Protection for this article? 
OMG administrators shall semi-protect the RMS Titanic artcie because there were too many vandalisms committed by IP addresses/anonymous users. 
(  


 ################################################################################ 


NEWLINENEWLINE== Unknown ==NEWLINENEWLINEI added a short neutral notation of the disposition of the medal awarded to the unknown soldier from the Vietnam war, together with a footnote linking to a DoD statement.NEWLINENEWLINE[[User:Lee-Anne|Lee-Anne]] ([[User talk:Lee-Anne|talk]]) 18:06, 31 October 2008 (UTC)
________________________________________________________________________________
 Unknown 

I added a short neutral notation of the disposition of the medal awarded to the unknown soldier from the Vietnam war, together with a footnote linking to a DoD statement.

  


 ################################################################################ 


"NEWLINENEWLINEThere aren't any disambiguation links, however the FN 41 is dead. You have to remove it, together with its information. — [[User:1111tomica|<span style=""text-shadow:#BBBBBB 0.1em 0.1em 0.1em; class=texhtml""><font color=""darkgreen"">'''Tomica'''</font >]] [[User talk:1111tomica|<font color=""darkgreen"">(talk)</font ></span>]] 15:17, 29 January 2012 (UTC)NEWLINENEWLINE;Infobox NEWLINE*Removed the video link and place it in the External links sectionNEWLINENEWLINE;LeadNEWLINE*In the first sentence, unlink debut and studio album per [[Wikipedia:OVERLINK]]— [[User:1111tomica|<span style=""text-shadow:#BBBBBB 0.1em 0.1em 0.1em; class=texhtml""><font color=""darkgreen"">'''Tomica'''</font >]] [[User talk:1111tomica|<font color=""darkgreen"">(talk)</font ></span>]] 15:17, 29 January 2012 (UTC)NEWLINE*''It was released on 9 March 2008 in the United Kingdom as Lewis's third single via digital downloads.'' ---> The song was digitally release as Lewis' third single on 9 March, 2008 in the United Kingdom. — [[User:1111tomica|<span style=""text-shadow:#BBBBBB 0.1em 0.1em 0.1em; class=texhtml""><font color=""darkgreen"">'''Tomica'''</font >]] [[User talk:1111tomica|<font color=""darkgreen"">(talk)</font ></span>]] 15:17, 29 January 2012 (UTC)NEWLINE*''The song is a pop-R&B song'' (awkward) ---> Footprints in the Sand is a pop and R&B song— [[User:1111tomica|<span style=""text-shadow:#BBBBBB 0.1em 0.1em 0.1em; class=texhtml""><font color=""darkgreen"">'''Tomica'''</font >]] [[User talk:1111tomica|<font color=""darkgreen"">(talk)</font ></span>]] 15:17, 29 January 2012 (UTC)NEWLINE*''""Footprints in the Sand"" was written in one day at Page's house in Malibu...'' ---> It was written in a period of one day at Page's home in Malibu...— [[User:1111tomica|<span style=""text-shadow:#BBBBBB 0.1em 0.1em 0.1em; class=texhtml""><font color=""darkgreen"">'''Tomica'''</font >]] [[User talk:1111tomica|<font color=""darkgreen"">(talk)</font ></span>]] 15:17, 29 January 2012 (UTC)NEWLINE*''The single became the official theme'' ---> ""Footprints in the Sand"" became the official theme— [[User:1111tomica|<span style=""text-shadow:#BBBBBB 0.1em 0.1em 0.1em; class=texhtml""><font color=""darkgreen"">'''Tomica'''</font >]] [[User talk:1111tomica|<font color=""darkgreen"">(talk)</font ></span>]] 15:17, 29 January 2012 (UTC)NEWLINE*''It received generally positive reviews by music critics,'' ---> The song received positive reviews from music critics,— [[User:1111tomica|<span style=""text-shadow:#BBBBBB 0.1em 0.1em 0.1em; class=texhtml""><font color=""darkgreen"">'''Tomica'''</font >]] [[User talk:1111tomica|<font color=""darkgreen"">(talk)</font ></span>]] 15:17, 29 January 2012 (UTC)NEWLINE*''""Footprints in the Sand"" charted as a single'' ---> ""Footprints in the Sand"" charted as a separate single— [[User:1111tomica|<span style=""text-shadow:#BBBBBB 0.1em 0.1em 0.1em; class=texhtml""><font color=""darkgreen"">'''Tomica'''</font >]] [[User talk:1111tomica|<font color=""darkgreen"">(talk)</font ></span>]] 15:17, 29 January 2012 (UTC)"
________________________________________________________________________________
"

There aren't any disambiguation links, however the FN 41 is dead. You have to remove it, together with its information. —  (talk) 

Infobox 
Removed the video link and place it in the External links section

Lead
In the first sentence, unlink debut and studio album per Wikipedia:OVERLINK—  (talk) 
It was released on 9 March 2008 in the United Kingdom as Lewis's third single via digital downloads. -> The song was digitally release as Lewis' third single on 9 March, 2008 in the United Kingdom. —  (talk) 
The song is a pop-R&B; song (awkward) -> Footprints in the Sand is a pop and R&B; song—  (talk) 
""Footprints in the Sand"" was written in one day at Page's house in Malibu... -> It was written in a period of one day at Page's home in Malibu...—  (talk) 
The single became the official theme -> ""Footprints in the Sand"" became the official theme—  (talk) 
It received generally positive reviews by music critics, -> The song received positive reviews from music critics,—  (talk) 
""Footprints in the Sand"" charted as a single -> ""Footprints in the Sand"" charted as a separate single—  (talk) "


 ################################################################################ 


=
________________________________________________________________________________
=


 ################################################################################ 


"NEWLINE:Notice ""casualties prior to Israel's independence""? Those deaths occurred in the context of [[WWII]] and White Papers, which played a role in the riots, massacres in Palestine, etc. Also, those ships were sunk BY the British and typically defensive actions by whatever Jewish militant groups existed at the time. [[User:Wikifan12345|Wikifan12345]] ([[User talk:Wikifan12345|talk]]) 01:07, 17 March 2010 (UTC)"
________________________________________________________________________________
"
Notice ""casualties prior to Israel's independence""? Those deaths occurred in the context of WWII and White Papers, which played a role in the riots, massacres in Palestine, etc. Also, those ships were sunk BY the British and typically defensive actions by whatever Jewish militant groups existed at the time.   "


 ################################################################################ 


"NEWLINENEWLINEDid you guys read [[Innate bisexuality]]? His theory was ''not'' that everyone was a bisexual. Quoting from that article:NEWLINENEWLINE:Innate bisexuality (or predisposition to bisexuality) is a term introduced by Sigmund Freud (based on work by his associate Wilhelm Fliess), and later used (and misused) by many to refer to the theory that all (or most) humans are capable of physical attraction to both sexes.NEWLINENEWLINEandNEWLINENEWLINE:The conclusions that he draws are based on the ''fact'' (which was actually incorrect) that at early stages of development, humans undergo a period of [[hermaphrodism]]. Based on this, he asserts that, ""''the conception which we gather from this long known anatomical fact is the original predisposition to [[bisexuality]], which in the course of development has changed to monosexuality, leaving slight remnants of the stunted sex.''""NEWLINENEWLINE[[User:Paul August|Paul August]] [[User_talk:Paul August|&#9742;]] 18:08, August 11, 2005 (UTC)"
________________________________________________________________________________
"

Did you guys read Innate bisexuality? His theory was not that everyone was a bisexual. Quoting from that article:

Innate bisexuality (or predisposition to bisexuality) is a term introduced by Sigmund Freud (based on work by his associate Wilhelm Fliess), and later used (and misused) by many to refer to the theory that all (or most) humans are capable of physical attraction to both sexes.

and

The conclusions that he draws are based on the fact (which was actually incorrect) that at early stages of development, humans undergo a period of hermaphrodism. Based on this, he asserts that, ""the conception which we gather from this long known anatomical fact is the original predisposition to bisexuality, which in the course of development has changed to monosexuality, leaving slight remnants of the stunted sex.""

 ☎ 18:08, August 11, 2005 (UTC)"


 ################################################################################ 


 NEWLINE
________________________________________________________________________________
 


 ################################################################################ 


, and begins tracking down Gracilis. Falco first meets Maena Priscilla, Gracilis' young wife, but the meeting soon gets heated and Falco is driven out, but not before getting hints from Gracilis' accountant that he had issues with money. Falco tries again and locates the lover of Gracilis' slave Rusticus named Regina, but the conversation soon gets heated and Regina becomes antagonistic. Next in line is Gracilis' Roman mistress, Julia Fortunata &mdash; who actually asked Falco to see her, because she too is looking for Gracilis. Out of leads, Falco finally tries to make enquiries with the camp prefect of the 14th Legion, but accidentally lets it slip that he was part of the infamous 2nd Augusta. Brusquely driven off and humiliated, he is warned by the camp prefect to cease asking around for Gracilis.NEWLINENEWLINE
________________________________________________________________________________
, and begins tracking down Gracilis. Falco first meets Maena Priscilla, Gracilis' young wife, but the meeting soon gets heated and Falco is driven out, but not before getting hints from Gracilis' accountant that he had issues with money. Falco tries again and locates the lover of Gracilis' slave Rusticus named Regina, but the conversation soon gets heated and Regina becomes antagonistic. Next in line is Gracilis' Roman mistress, Julia Fortunata — who actually asked Falco to see her, because she too is looking for Gracilis. Out of leads, Falco finally tries to make enquiries with the camp prefect of the 14th Legion, but accidentally lets it slip that he was part of the infamous 2nd Augusta. Brusquely driven off and humiliated, he is warned by the camp prefect to cease asking around for Gracilis.


 ################################################################################ 


NEWLINENEWLINE:Agree also, but perhaps art comics/graphic novels should get a mention as genres that are related and ''sometimes'' included under the rubric of book art (the major collections include some, and Printed Matter and especially bookartbookshop stock some). This could go in the 'Critical Issues/Debate' section - probably under 'definition'. There is one excellent book I've come accross that sits exactly between the artist's book and the graphic novel and is therefore useful as a talking point - 'A to Z' by Lars Arrenius, a description and tiny image of which can be found [[http://www.paulgravett.com/articles/030_britcomics/030_britcomics.htm#atoz here]]. [[User:Emilyartinian|Emily Artinian]] 07:51, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
________________________________________________________________________________
Agree also, but perhaps art comics/graphic novels should get a mention as genres that are related and sometimes included under the rubric of book art (the major collections include some, and Printed Matter and especially bookartbookshop stock some). This could go in the 'Critical Issues/Debate' section - probably under 'definition'. There is one excellent book I've come accross that sits exactly between the artist's book and the graphic novel and is therefore useful as a talking point - 'A to Z' by Lars Arrenius, a description and tiny image of which can be found [here].  


 ################################################################################ 


Oh, I'm wrong too (after reading some of those ghits). A Pixel is (or can be seen as) a point-sample. Duh. I am moron. --[[User:Kim Bruning|Kim Bruning]] ([[User talk:Kim Bruning|talk]]) 23:51, 28 July 2008 (UTC)NEWLINENEWLINE
________________________________________________________________________________
Oh, I'm wrong too (after reading some of those ghits). A Pixel is (or can be seen as) a point-sample. Duh. I am moron.   


 ################################################################################ 


[[User:Adabow]] has contested  the factual, encyclopaedic nature of this article.NEWLINE*The following reference material is disputed: None.NEWLINE*The following issues have been raised: None.NEWLINE*The following comments have been left: NoneNEWLINENEWLINEPlease provide further details to the published statement here:
________________________________________________________________________________
User:Adabow has contested  the factual, encyclopaedic nature of this article.
The following reference material is disputed: None.
The following issues have been raised: None.
The following comments have been left: None

Please provide further details to the published statement here:


 ################################################################################ 


|class=Stub|importance=Low
________________________________________________________________________________
|class=Stub|importance=Low


 ################################################################################ 


" style=""font-size: smaller;"" class=""autosigned"">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/71.234.215.133|71.234.215.133]] ([[User talk:71.234.215.133|talk]]) 14:50, 16 July 2010 (UTC)</span"
________________________________________________________________________________
" style=""font-size: smaller;"" class=""autosigned"">—Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.234.215.133  


 ################################################################################ 


"NEWLINENEWLINESupporter of Fomenko would say that these ""facts"" about Gregory VII are not facts, but rather hypotheses based on conventional chronology. Do we have any authentic documents written by Gregory VII where he mentions Jesus? Do we know anything at all about Gregory VII that is not based on works of people who lived several centuries after him? Do we have any physical proof that Jesus spoke Aramaic? Etc. Every single of these facts you mentioned is disputed by Fomenko. That's what I mean when I'm saying that the theory is consistent. NEWLINEI'm not trying to defend this theory, rather I'm saying that it can't be defeated by such trivial arguments. NEWLINENEWLINEYou're asking me to find a claim that makes sense. How about this. ( The information comes from Fomenko's book, so you may want to double-check the information )NEWLINEThe methods we use to calculate the date of Easter were established by Alexandrian mathematicians in the 3rd century and chosen at Nicaean council in 325. One of the objectives those mathematicians had was to devise a scheme that guarantees that the Easter always takes place after Jewish Passover ( they are never on the same date ). In Julian calendar and in the assumption of correctness of [[Metonic cycle]], dates of Easter and Passover repeat every 532 years, so it is only necessary to calculate dates for 532 years to make sure they never coincide. NEWLINEThe problem is that if we use this algorithm to calculate dates of Easter and Passover for 4th century, we discover that they coincide several times ( e.g. in 316, 319 and 343 ). The last time they coincided was in 784 AD. Therefore, per Fomenko, the earliest the Paschal cycle could have been established was in 9th century.NEWLINENEWLINEYou can use this link:NEWLINEhttp://www.phys.uu.nl/~vgent/easter/easter_text2a.htmNEWLINENEWLINEIt claims: ""The Julian Easter algorithm should not be used before c. 530 AD as it differs slightly from the computations of the Christians of Alexandria and from the 532-year cycle of Victorius of Aquitaine that was used in the western parts of Europe up to the 8th century AD"" It's sufficient to refute this claim if you can find proof that our modern algorithm is different from that of Alexandrian Christians and their algorithm does not have this problem. I couldn't.NEWLINENEWLINE--[[User:Itinerant1|Itinerant1]] 08:33, 15 Apr 2005 (UTC)"
________________________________________________________________________________
"

Supporter of Fomenko would say that these ""facts"" about Gregory VII are not facts, but rather hypotheses based on conventional chronology. Do we have any authentic documents written by Gregory VII where he mentions Jesus? Do we know anything at all about Gregory VII that is not based on works of people who lived several centuries after him? Do we have any physical proof that Jesus spoke Aramaic? Etc. Every single of these facts you mentioned is disputed by Fomenko. That's what I mean when I'm saying that the theory is consistent. 
I'm not trying to defend this theory, rather I'm saying that it can't be defeated by such trivial arguments. 

You're asking me to find a claim that makes sense. How about this. ( The information comes from Fomenko's book, so you may want to double-check the information )
The methods we use to calculate the date of Easter were established by Alexandrian mathematicians in the 3rd century and chosen at Nicaean council in 325. One of the objectives those mathematicians had was to devise a scheme that guarantees that the Easter always takes place after Jewish Passover ( they are never on the same date ). In Julian calendar and in the assumption of correctness of Metonic cycle, dates of Easter and Passover repeat every 532 years, so it is only necessary to calculate dates for 532 years to make sure they never coincide. 
The problem is that if we use this algorithm to calculate dates of Easter and Passover for 4th century, we discover that they coincide several times ( e.g. in 316, 319 and 343 ). The last time they coincided was in 784 AD. Therefore, per Fomenko, the earliest the Paschal cycle could have been established was in 9th century.

You can use this link:
http://www.phys.uu.nl/~vgent/easter/easter_text2a.htm

It claims: ""The Julian Easter algorithm should not be used before c. 530 AD as it differs slightly from the computations of the Christians of Alexandria and from the 532-year cycle of Victorius of Aquitaine that was used in the western parts of Europe up to the 8th century AD"" It's sufficient to refute this claim if you can find proof that our modern algorithm is different from that of Alexandrian Christians and their algorithm does not have this problem. I couldn't.

 08:33, 15 Apr 2005 (UTC)"


 ################################################################################ 


It is not the coding that is notable it is what seems like a reaction by Nintendo to the discovery, by sending out official special miis. Something which has not happened since.--[[User:Guest|Guest]] 11:50 31 October 2007 (UTC)NEWLINENEWLINE
________________________________________________________________________________
It is not the coding that is notable it is what seems like a reaction by Nintendo to the discovery, by sending out official special miis. Something which has not happened since. 11:50 31 October 2007 (UTC)


 ################################################################################ 


NEWLINENEWLINE== Incorrect transliteration ==NEWLINEI'll willingly admit to ignorance, but why is it incorrect? What would the correct transliteration be? [[User:Safebreaker|Safebreaker]] ([[User talk:Safebreaker|talk]]) 18:20, 20 September 2009 (UTC)
________________________________________________________________________________
 Incorrect transliteration 
I'll willingly admit to ignorance, but why is it incorrect? What would the correct transliteration be?   


 ################################################################################ 


They must be looked for
________________________________________________________________________________
They must be looked for


 ################################################################################ 


NEWLINENEWLINE== Smith and Cynk - doubtful historians ==NEWLINENEWLINEBoth Smith and Cynk are fans of airforce. They don't know anything about about the ground war and the only sources they had were probably German, rationalizig and/or whitewashing. The whole Wieluń dispute is parallel to the [[Guernica]] one, whitewashing and/or rationalizing.[[User:Xx236|Xx236]] ([[User talk:Xx236|talk]]) 07:48, 4 September 2009 (UTC)
________________________________________________________________________________
 Smith and Cynk - doubtful historians 

Both Smith and Cynk are fans of airforce. They don't know anything about about the ground war and the only sources they had were probably German, rationalizig and/or whitewashing. The whole Wieluń dispute is parallel to the Guernica one, whitewashing and/or rationalizing.  


 ################################################################################ 


"==Yahoo! group==NEWLINENEWLINEI contend that the link to the ""Vulcan Mentat"" Yahoo Group doesn't belong, since it has little to do with the Vulcans of Star Trek, and isn't a source of further information such as belongs in an encyclopedia. That's why I'm removing it (again). -- [[User:Arteitle|Arteitle]] 22:59, 28 Nov 2003 (UTC)NEWLINENEWLINE==Interbreeding=="
________________________________________________________________________________
"==Yahoo! group==

I contend that the link to the ""Vulcan Mentat"" Yahoo Group doesn't belong, since it has little to do with the Vulcans of Star Trek, and isn't a source of further information such as belongs in an encyclopedia. That's why I'm removing it (again).   22:59, 28 Nov 2003 (UTC)

Interbreeding"


 ################################################################################ 


NEWLINENEWLINENEWLINE::I wrote this article because I wanted to help you figure out what the other Mecha Rouges were because the other Mecha Rouges didn't have any information about them.
________________________________________________________________________________
I wrote this article because I wanted to help you figure out what the other Mecha Rouges were because the other Mecha Rouges didn't have any information about them.


 ################################################################################ 


#REDIRECT [[Talk:List of video game exclusives (seventh generation)]]
________________________________________________________________________________
REDIRECT Talk:List of video game exclusives (seventh generation)


 ################################################################################ 


NEWLINENEWLINE== Uses? ==NEWLINENEWLINENEWLINEThis is an encylopedia, I'm pretty sure its supposed to have more information than just its chemical properties, especially for something as common as vinyl.
________________________________________________________________________________
 Uses? 

This is an encylopedia, I'm pretty sure its supposed to have more information than just its chemical properties, especially for something as common as vinyl.


 ################################################################################ 


There do not seem to be any admin messages to remove


In [ ]: